Which Performance Tests Best Define the Special Judo Fitness Test Classification in Elite Judo Athletes?

Spread the knowledge!


The normative values of the Special Judo Fitness Test (SJFT) are used to evaluate judo athletes, and the question arises of which performance tests from crucial motor abilities best define the SJFT classification in elite judo athletes. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between elite judo athletes’ physical performance and the evaluation using SJFT index norms. Nineteen judo athletes (11 females) (22.8 ± 2.5 years old) from the senior judo national team voluntarily participated in this study. Body composition, reaction time, balance, flexibility, agility, hand grip strength, 20 m sprint, vertical jump, SJFT, and Wingate tests were performed by athletes on four separate days at one-day intervals. Athletes were classified as regular and above (≥regular) or poor and below (≤poor) according to their SJFT index scores. Simple logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate this classification’s consistency with performance test results. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals related to each possible factor and Wald test statistics were calculated. The SJFT index classification was associated with Wingate peak and mean power, vertical jump, and sprint performance results (p < 0.05), whereas it was not associated with body fat percentage, agility, reaction time, hand grip strength, flexibility, and balance performances (p > 0.05). SJFT index classificatory norms are mainly related to athletes’ anaerobic power. Higher anaerobic power increases athletes’ possibility of being classified as ≥regular. 

Keywords: performance evaluation; SJFT index; combat sports; field testing

Download the full article HERE.

6 thoughts on “Which Performance Tests Best Define the Special Judo Fitness Test Classification in Elite Judo Athletes?

  • Wow, fantastic weblog layout! How long have you been blogging for?
    you make blogging glance easy. The overall look of your website is fantastic, as neatly as the content
    material! You can see similar here najlepszy sklep

  • With everything which seems to be developing inside this subject matter, many of your viewpoints are somewhat refreshing. Having said that, I appologize, because I can not subscribe to your whole plan, all be it radical none the less. It would seem to us that your commentary are actually not completely rationalized and in simple fact you are generally your self not completely convinced of your argument. In any event I did appreciate reading through it.

  • Well I sincerely enjoyed studying it. This information provided by you is very helpful for accurate planning.

  • It抯 really a cool and useful piece of information. I抦 glad that you shared this useful information with us. Please keep us informed like this. Thanks for sharing.

  • Howdy! I know this is kind of off topic but I was wondering which blog platform are you using for this website? I’m getting tired of WordPress because I’ve had problems with hackers and I’m looking at alternatives for another platform. I would be awesome if you could point me in the direction of a good platform.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *